Parents oppose plan to reopen Lagos schools

Some parents in Lagos State have kicked against the reopening of schools in view of the continued spread of the coronavirus in the country.

According to the News Agency of Nigeria, the parents said it was important for the Federal and state governments to continue to safeguard children from the pandemic.

Earlier on Wednesday, the Federal Government had said it was considering adopting morning and afternoon shifts of classes for reopening of schools.

One of the parents, Mrs Ayobami Ojo, urged the government to allow children to remain at home until containment of the pandemic.

“There is no need for morning and evening classes. Let the children continue to stay safe at home as the virus is increasing every day.

“Children will naturally not be as cautious as adults and schools cannot be compared to markets. Reopening of schools should be considered when confirmed cases drop very well,” Ojo said.

Also, a businesswoman, Mrs Abiodun Aina, who lives at Ayobo, said that children’s lives could be jeopardised when schools resume.

“It is difficult to control adults, let alone children, we should not risk the lives of children. A two-shift option for classes may not stop the spread of the virus. It is better for them to remain at home until COVID -19 subsides or a vaccine is found,” she said.

“Nigerians should stop putting pressure on government to reopen schools. Why are we in a rush? We need to be patient,” Aina said.

University of California Will End Use of SAT and ACT in Admissions

The change is expected to accelerate the momentum of American colleges away from the tests, amid concern that they are unfair to poor, black and Hispanic students.

Credit…Jeff Chiu/Associated Press

SACRAMENTO — The University of California on Thursday voted to phase out the SAT and ACT as requirements to apply to its system of 10 schools, which include some of the nation’s most popular campuses, in a decision with major implications for the use of standardized tests in college admissions.

Given the size and influence of the California system, whose marquee schools include the University of California, Los Angeles, and the University of California, Berkeley, the move is expected to accelerate the momentum of American colleges away from the tests, amid charges that they are unfair to poor, black and Hispanic students.

The school system’s action, which follows many small liberal arts colleges, comes as the ACT and the College Board, a nonprofit organization that administers the SAT, are suffering financially from the cancellation of test dates during the coronavirus pandemic. One critic of the industry estimated that the College Board had lost $45 million in revenue this spring.

Although many students will likely continue to take the exams as long as they are required by highly competitive schools like Stanford and those in the Ivy League, California’s decision will clearly be a blow to the image of the tests, and experts said it could tip the balance for other schools in deciding whether to eliminate them.

The University of California is one of the best institutions in the world, so whatever decision they make will be extraordinarily influential,” said Terry W. Hartle, senior vice president at the American Council on Education, a trade group. “Whatever U.C. does will have ripple effects across American higher education, particularly at leading public universities.”

Like many colleges nationwide, University of California schools had already made the SAT and ACT optional for this year’s applicants, after testing dates were disrupted by the pandemic. Both companies have announced that they will introduce an online testing option for the first time in the fall.

On Thursday, the California system’s governing board voted unanimously to extend that optional period for another year, and then not consider scores for two years when determining whether to accept in-state applicants, using standardized tests only to award scholarships, determine course placement and assess out-of-state students.

In 2025, consideration of the SAT or ACT for any student’s admission, in or out of state, would be eliminated.

“These tests are extremely flawed and very unfair,” said Lt. Gov. Eleni Kounalakis, a member of the board who supported the decision, adding, “Enough is enough.”

In the meantime, the university will do a study on the feasibility of creating its own admissions test, perhaps in collaboration with other California schools.

In a statement after the vote, the College Board predicted that the governing board’s decision would add to the burden of high school students applying for college if the system creates its own exam, saying that many students will still take the SAT or ACT to apply to other institutions.

“Having to take multiple tests will likely cause many of these students to limit their college options much earlier in the college search process,” the organization said.

Some 300,000 students attend University of California schools, and six of its campuses top the list of American schools with the most applicants, with U.C.L.A. consistently the most sought after. Four-fifths of applicants to the system’s schools take the SAT, providing the largest source of customers for the College Board, which brings in more than $1 billion a year in revenue.

In addition to the SAT, the organization also administers Advanced Placement tests for high school students and other testing programs. Experts said that despite actions like the California system’s, the testing industry is likely to survive in some form.

Standardized testing has been declining as an element in the college admissions process for some time,” Mr. Hartle said. “But the College Board is a large and financially stable organization, and they’ve been around for a long time.”

The move to do away with testing only deepened after last year’s college admissions scandal. More than 1,230 colleges and universities have made the SAT and ACT optional for admission, according to FairTest, a group that has pushed to end testing requirements — most of them small liberal arts colleges such as Smith, Pitzer and Sarah Lawrence.

Another 70 or so colleges and universities suspended the testing requirement for the fall application cycle because of the coronavirus.

In California, the board acted Thursday on a proposal from the university system’s president, Janet Napolitano, which came after several years of pressure. A lawsuit filed last year by a largely black school district in Compton, Calif., and a coalition of students and advocacy groups argues that the time-honored tests discriminate based on race and income.

The decision, however, ran counter to a recommendation from the system’s faculty senate, which voted in April to keep the SAT and ACT. A faculty task force commissioned to study the impact of standardized tests found that they predict college success within the University of California system more effectively than high school grades or other measures.

In fact, the task force found that in many cases the tests gave a leg up to black, Latino and low-income students by offering an additional metric for admissions officers who might have rejected them because their grades did not meet the university’s threshold.

Robert May, a philosophy professor at the University of California, Davis, who appointed the faculty panel, said the regents’ decision would add confusion and significant costs to the admissions process at the mammoth system, and make admissions determinations even more subjective in the short-term.

Marten Roorda, the chief executive of the ACT, told the regents in a letter before the vote that dropping the testing requirements would “further the uncertainty and anxiety of students and their families at a time when they need all the reassurances and resources we can provide.”

Supporters of standardized tests have argued that they provide an important yardstick to assess students across disparate school districts and states. And the College Board and ACT say any inequities in their results reflect existing gaps in the American educational system, and are not a fault of the tests themselves.

In response to criticism, the College Board proposed a new SAT grading system last year that came to be known as the “adversity score,” which would put each test taker’s results into the context of that student’s school or neighborhood. But the company withdrew that proposal after being criticized for trying to distill complex factors into a single score.

Testing opponents marked a major victory two years ago when the highly ranked University of Chicago went test optional. The school reported last year that the entering freshman class had nearly a quarter more first-generation and low-income students and 56 percent more rural students than the prior year, with about 10 percent opting against submitting test scores.

In the University of California system, standardized test scores are just one component of a complex admissions formula, which includes more than a dozen metrics, including high school grade point averages. The state guarantees acceptance to the top 12.5 percent of California high school students.

But as California has struggled to maintain campus diversity since voters passed a 1996 ban on affirmative action, pressure has grown for the school system to take action. Its top campuses have become almost as difficult to get into as some Ivy League schools and are demographically dominated by white and Asian students.

For the last 20 years, black enrollment at University of California schools has scarcely broken 4 percent, though African-Americans represent 6.5 percent of the state’s population. Nearly 40 percent of the state is Hispanic, California’s largest ethnic group, but only 22 percent of students in the school system are.

Carol Christ, now the Berkeley chancellor, was one of the first university administrators to eliminate the SAT requirement nearly two decades ago when she became president of Smith College. On Thursday, she told the regents that she viewed standardized testing as “a biased instrument” that would only become more skewed in the wake of the pandemic.

Anemona Hartocollis contributed reporting from New York.

Five Phases of Professional Development

By North Central Regional Educational Laboratory

Too often, teachers say that the professionaldevelopment they receive provides limited application to their everyday world of teaching and learning. Here The North Central Regional Educational Laboratory shares a five-phase framework that can help create comprehensive, ongoing, and — most importantly — meaningful professional development.

The North Central Regional Educational Laboratory has developed a research-based professional development framework that promotes ongoing professional development and encourages individual reflection and group inquiry into teachers’ practice. In practice, the five phases overlap, repeat, and often occur simultaneously:

  • Building a Knowledge Base. 
  • The purpose of this phase is to acquire new knowledge and information and to build a conceptual understanding of it. Activities in this phase might include goal setting, assessing needs, participating in interactive workshops, and forming a study group.

  • Observing Models and Examples. 
  • The purpose of this phase is to study instructional examples in order to develop a practical understanding of the research. In this phase, one might participate in activities such as school and classroom visitations, peer observation, using instructional artifacts, co-planning, and listening to or watching audio and video examples.

  • Reflecting on Your Practice. 
  • The purpose of this phase is to analyze your instructional practice on the basis of new knowledge. Activities in this phase might include the use of journals or teacher-authored cases for collegial discussion and reflection.

  • Changing Your Practice. 
  • The purpose of this phase is to translate your new knowledge into individual and collaborative plans and actions for curricular and instructional change. Activities might include action research, peer-coaching, support groups, and curriculum development.

  • Gaining and Sharing Expertise. 
  • The purpose of this phase is to continue to refine your instructional practice, learning with and from colleagues while also sharing your practical wisdom with your peers. Activities in this phase might include team planning, mentoring or partnering with a colleague, and participating in a network.

School Reopening: FG Seeks Cooperation of Private Owners

By Kayode Oyero

*Emeka Nwajiuba

The Federal Government has called for cooperation from owners of private institutions of learning ahead of school reopening.

The Minister of State for Education, Emeka Nwajiuba, on Wednesday, made this known during a briefing by the Presidential Task Force on COVID-19 in Abuja.

The minister said the government was working on modalities to achieve social distancing and good hygiene practices before schools could be allowed to reopen.

He also described as false, reports that schools would reopen in the country on June 8, saying the government could not afford to take any expensive risk.

Nwajiuba said, “We are going to publish a specification on what we expect COVID-19 or post-COVID-19 reopening to look like. We are not talking about coping with COVID-19 but in spite of COVID-19, we expect that we will adapt.

“For a country that has over 115,000 primary schools, you will understand that 35,000 of these who are private must agree to set up the same standard in other to allow children to go in.”

Earlier, the PTF Chairman, Boss Mustapha, urged all school administrators to start taking steps that would aid school reopening.

“We urge states, local governments, proprietors and all other stakeholders to begin to take steps that will facilitate an early and safe reopening,” the Secretary to the Government of the Federation said.

The PUNCH reports that the FG shut all schools in the country in March as part of measures to curb the spread of the coronavirus pandemic.

Almajirai: Pass Child Rights Act, NHRC tells 11 States

By Ade Adesomuju

*Tony Ojukwu

The National Human Rights Commission on Wednesday urged the 11 northern states of the federation that had not domesticated the Child’s Rights Act to quickly do so.

The Executive Secretary of the commission, Mr Tony Ojukwu, stated that the passage of the law by the states could help to address the problems associated with Almajiri.

This is contained in the NHRC’s statement commemorating this year’s edition of Children’s Day marked globally on May 27 of every year.

 Ojukwu stated that since 2003, the NHRC in collaboration with other stakeholders had been championing the passage of the Child Rights Act into laws of the various states of the federation.

“As at today, only 25 out of the 36 states have passed the CRA into law in their various states. The situation leaves a huge gap in our collective efforts to protect our children,” he stated.

 An official of the United Nations Children’s Fund, Sharon Oladiji, had in May last year listed the 11 states that had yet to pass the CRA.

The states comprised Bauchi, Yobe, Kano, Sokoto, Adamawa, Borno, Zamfara, Gombe, Katsina, Kebbi and Jigawa.

 Ojuwku said, “The commission wishes to use the opportunity of the 2020 Children’s Day celebration to call on all states that have not passed the CRA to do so without further delay.

“The passage of the Act will also help to address the problem of Almajiri once and for all. The children must be reunited with the parents and provisions made for their education in a structured and progressive manner as stipulated in the Child Rights Act.”

Ojukwu noted that with the challenges of COVID -19, “children as vulnerable groups face growing risks”.

 He added that they “are facing disorientation due to closure of schools, disrupted academic schedules and limited recreational activities basic to their survival and development.”

He also stated, “They encounter domestic violence, sexual exploitation, torture, inhuman and degrading treatment and other forms of abuse.

“Parents need to take extra care of the children, help the children stay socially connected with friends and family within the protocols, support the child with information about COVID-19, teach them the basic hygiene, to wash their hands often with soap and use of sanitisers and face masks to stop the virus from spreading.”

Children’s Day: Girl-Child Education Must be Sustained – Aisha Buhari

*Aisha Buhari

By Kayode Oyero

Aisha Buhari, wife of the President of Nigeria, Major General Muhammadu Buhari (retd.), has urged children in the country to take online learning seriously.

She stated this on Wednesday while congratulating the leaders of tomorrow on the occasion of the 2020 International Children’s Day.

Aisha said despite the coronavirus pandemic that necessitated the closure of schools in the country, the education of the girl-child must be “sustained”.

“I congratulate Nigerian children on the occasion of the 2020 International Children’s Day. This year’s event is special because it is the first to be celebrated indoors due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

“The theme for this year is Promoting Girl-child Education for Sustainable Development. It tells us that despite the present challenge, we cannot rest on our oars, we must ensure that girl-child education is sustained in terms of quality and scale.

“To our children, please enjoy your day while observing the protocol of COVID-19. As we pray for the reopening of schools soon, make use of the stay at home by taking to your online studies seriously,” she said.

BREAKING: FG to Release Guidelines on School Reopening

By Kayode Oyero

*Adamu Adamu, Minister of Education

The Federal Government of Nigeria has said it would roll out the course of action for the reopening of schools in the country.

The Chairman of the Presidential Task Force on COVID-19, Boss Mustapha, stated this during a briefing on Monday in Abuja.

While congratulating children in the country on the occasion of this year’s Children’s Day, the Secretary to the Government of the Federation urged stakeholders to begin to take steps that would aid the reopening of schools in the country.

He said, “I wish to inform Nigerians that the Federal Ministry of Education will roll out measures for the self-reopening of schools.

“The Presidential Task Force wishes to use the occasion of this celebration to congratulate our children and assure them, their parents and all stakeholders alike that all hands are on deck to reopen schools at a safe time.

“We, therefore, use this medium to urge states, local governments, proprietors and all other stakeholders to begin to take steps that will facilitate an early and safe reopening.”

Children’s Day: Lawan Calls for Domestication of Child Rights Act

By Sunday Abirisade

*Senator Ahmed Lawan

President of the Senate, Ahmad Lawan, has felicitated with Nigerian children on the occasion of the 2020 Children’s Day.

Lawan noted that the Day was set aside to highlight the realities of children in society with a view to promoting their well-being and happiness now and for the future.

The Senate President, in a statement by his media office on Wednesday, said the surest route to a happy and fulfilling future for children was to provide them quality education and healthcare and to protect them against all forms of abuse.

Lawan said it was that realisation that led the Federal Government in 1976 to introduce Universal Primary Education, which in 1999 was expanded to the Universal Basic Education,  and also to enact the Child Rights Act in 2003.

The Senate President expressed concern that despite all such efforts, Nigeria is still heavily burdened with a high number of out-of-school children, a situation which he said portends a grave danger for the country

“I want to use the opportunity of this occasion to assure our children that the National Assembly is fully aware of the challenges that they face and will continue to work to guarantee them and our country a better future.

“I also call on the authorities at the sub-national level who have not done so, to domesticate the Child Rights Act for the sake of the future of our children,” Lawan said.

He called for collaboration between the Federal and state governments in comprehensively addressing issues relating to the plight of Nigerian children.

On the part of parents, Lawan urged them to dutifully play their own role in providing immediate needs for their children, for the future peace of the children, parents and the country.

Send Your Children to Almajirai School, Risk Jail –El-Rufai

By Godwin Isenyo

*Nasir El Rufai

The Governor of Kaduna State, North-West Nigeria, Mallam Nasir El-Rufai, warned on Monday that parents who enrol their children into Almajirinci system of education risk a jail term of two years.

The governor gave the warning when he visited over 200 Almajirai returned from neighbouring states of Kano , Plateau, Bauchi, Gombe and Niger to Kaduna.

The Almajirai were undergoing rehabilitation and optical screening at Government College, Kaduna.

According to the governor,  any Islamic cleric who enrols any child into the Almajirinci system will  be prosecuted and jailed as well as fined N100,000 or N200,000 per child.

El-Rufai noted that all the Almajirai pupils sent from other states of the country were indigenes of the state, adding that the government would accord them the opportunity to grow and develop.

The governor said, “We will, therefore, continue to take delivery of every Almajiri pupil indigene of Kaduna State for rehabilitation, treatment and enrolment into formal school nearest to where their parents live.

“We will continue to do this until we clear Kaduna State of the menace of Almajiri system, which is not education but the abuse of the privilege and future of a child.

“Our ultimate goal is for them to acquire formal education without depriving them of the opportunity to acquire Quranic education.”

“They will continue their Quranic education but under the care of their parents and not under someone who does not know them or paid to look after them.”

El-rufai added that every child in Kaduna State must get 12-year free and compulsory primary and secondary school education.

“As such, no parent has any excuse for his child not to go to school.

“Those that cannot proceed to senior secondary school will have the opportunity to go to 

Corporate Education Will Never Return To The Classroom

By Brandon Busteed

Through numerous conversations with chief learning and human resource officers from companies around the globe, it has become quite clear that corporate education and training will never return to the in-person classroom. Sure, there will be exceptions where training will be necessary in-person (think physical equipment, medical labs, etc.) – but any education and training that can be done online will be done online, always, from this point forward. The reasons for this are simple: companies have realized they can do it faster, more effectively and less expensively online while their employees also widely prefer it too. 

Corporate education, like higher education, was certainly heading in the direction of more online learning long before the Covid-19 disruption. But it was more of a plodding pace. The past two months, of course, there’s been no choice; everyone is online. While colleges and universities are desperately trying to reopen campuses for the fall, companies are quickly and quietly planning never to return to the classroom. The expense and time of bringing together groups of employees for in-person training is exorbitant in comparison to high-quality online versions. Air travel, hotels, windowless conference rooms and convention centers, the risk liability of group training events and, frankly, the poor quality and unmeasurable outcomes of in-person corporate training have always been complaints. These complaints are greatly amplified now in comparison to the online alternative.

Just as companies like Twitter have realized they can operate with 100% work-from-home workforces, corporate education leaders are realizing they can bring their training entirely online. Employees can do it when time allows and more flexibly from home. More sophisticated online courses can customize content to individual learners and track and measure learning outcomes in ways that even the best in-person training has never been able to do. And while there is a wide range of quality across various online offerings, astute purchasers and consumers of online training are quickly discerning the good from the bad and the ugly. Gone will be the click-through-slide-while-turning-off-the-audio junk courses for compliance training. We’ll see an explosion of world-class online options across all industries.

Beyond some of the differences between online and in-person education that Covid-19 has suddenly brought into the open, there stands perhaps the biggest reason for shifting online: the need for scale and speed. Nothing brings this demand into closer focus than last year’s report from IBM which revealed that companies estimate it takes 36 days on average to re-skill or up-skill employees – up from just 3 days a mere five years ago! This is a meteoric shift that suddenly makes in-person education obsolete because of its high cost and inability to scale to thousands of employees in rapid fashion. Yes, Covid-19 has given us reason to move online. But corporate education was already on that inevitable track based on the speed at which business is moving and the demands required to keep humans relevant in their current jobs and ready for new ones. 

No doubt, some working adults will miss (and prefer) in-person education. But in the employer world, online is the new reality because it’s now suddenly the only practical solution during Covid-19 and beyond. Will it also be a canary in the coal mine for schools and universities? The vast majority of traditional age students (and their teachers and parents) still greatly desire returning to the classroom and campus. But the education consumer is also quickly splintering into many new archetypes. And those will include traditional age students who will gladly shift to fully online and hybrid degrees in exchange for lower price points, faster completion and the ability to work while doing so. Students will simply have more options to choose from and decisions to make regarding their preferences for in-person vs. online. In the corporate world, though, the decision has already been made.